COUNCIL BIDS FACE CHALLENGE

http://theadvocate.com/news/3719033-123/council-bids-face-challenge

COUNCIL BIDS FACE CHALLENGE

Baton Rouge Advocate,  8/25/12

Two candidates for East Baton Rouge Metro Council are facing lawsuits in state court that seek to have their names removed from the Nov. 6 ballot.

Gerry Juneau, a resident of District 12, filed suit Friday alleging that incumbent Rodney “Smokie” Bourgeois is ineligible to run for re-election because he lives outside the district.

Friday was the last day challenges could be filed against candidates to have their names removed from the ballot.

Juneau said he has nothing against Bourgeois but thinks he should run in District 10, where he owns a house.  “I just don’t think it’s right,” Juneau said. “If he wants to be a councilman so bad, why doesn’t he run in District 10?”  Bourgeois has owned a home at 2195 Kleinert Avenue since 1988, which is in District 10. But he represents and is running for re-election in District 12, where he leases a home.  District 12 includes the Kenilworth, Magnolia Woods, Pollard Estates, Southdowns and Valley Park neighborhoods.  Bourgeois lists the leased home, 1225 Highland Park, as his official residency in qualifying papers and on his voter registration card.
Bourgeois also claimed homestead exemption at the Kleinert home until 2009 when he became a Metro Councilman.  “It’s fairly clear that the homestead exemption was canceled because you must be registered to vote where you have homestead exemption, and he would have had to register to vote at Kleinert,” Juneau’s attorney Donald Hodge said. “That would have been District 10, not 12.”  Bourgeois said he doesn’t spend the majority of his time at any of his properties.  Records show that he pays the sewer utility bills at his Kleinert home and a man named Ryan Salario pays the sewer utility bills at the Highland Park home.

Bourgeois owns two George’s restaurants in District 12, one on Perkins Road and another on Highland Road.

Bourgeois questioned whether the suit was being filed by supporters of his best-financed competitor, John Delgado, or by someone in the food truck business, since he proposed earlier this year an ordinance to regulate the food truck industry. The ordinance failed.  Bourgeois said he is not breaking any law and is confident that he’ll prevail in court, but joked that being disqualified would be a favor.  “This is great news for me,” he said. “God bless Mr. Juneau.”

If Bourgeois is disqualified, then Delgado, a Republican, will face Rose Carey, a Democrat, in the election.Welch’s hearing will be Monday before Judge Bill Morvant and Bourgeois’ hearing will be Tuesday before Judge Tim Kelley.

2) Comment by Terd Handler - 08/25/2012

I certainly hope the DA pursues criminal charges against Smokie because he has fraudently been representing District 12 for the past four years. His counil votes have not represented the majority of District 12 residents. Now we know why....he isn't even one of us.

COUNCILMAN'S RESIDENCY CALLED INTO QUESTION

http://theadvocate.com/home/3701097-125/councilmans-residency-called-into-question#.UDkBinvcvp0.email
COUNCILMAN'S RESIDENCY CALLED INTO QUESTION
Baton Rouge Advocate, 8/25/12

John Delgado, who is running for District 12 Metro councilman, is raising questions about whether incumbent Rodney “Smokie” Bourgeois resides in the district he represents.  “Since I announced my candidacy, I have received dozens of phone calls and emails alerting me that Smokie doesn’t live in the district,” Delgado said. “I know that he claims to rent a house in District 12, but he actually owns a much nicer house on Kleinert Avenue in District 10.”

Bourgeois, who claims in qualifying documents and his voter registration that his official residence is 1225 Highland Park, said he isn’t breaking any rules.  “I have an officially signed and documented lease on that house,” Bourgeois said of the house on Highland Park. “I’m in full compliance with the law.”  He also owns a home in the Garden District at 2195 Kleinert Ave., which is in Council District 10, represented by Councilwoman Tara Wicker, near the boundary with District 12.  Asked what he considers his primary residence, Bourgeois said, “Where ever I feel like living. I’ve never kept a log.”  “I don’t have to live in that house all of the time,” he said of the Highland Park residence. “All that has to be is an official residence, and what I do with it is my business.”  When asked if he sublets his Highland Park house, Bourgeois said he does not. He later acknowledged that another man stays at the house “part time” and pays what Bourgeois described as “a pittance” to help with rent.  “It’s not a sublease, so to speak,” Bourgeois said. “If I want to move three or four people in there, that’s my right. But I also have a bed there, and I can wash my clothes there if I want.”  The person who receives the sewer bill at the Highland Park residence is Ryan Salario, according to records obtained through a public records request to the city-parish.  Asked about Salario, Bourgeois responded, “He’s a private individual.”  Bourgeois is listed as the recipient of the sewer bill at the Kleinert address.

Bourgeois has owned the Kleinert Avenue home since 1988, according to records. The last year he claimed homestead exemption on the Kleinert property was in 2008, the year before he took office. A homeowner can only claim homestead exemption on property he or she claims as a primary residence.  Bourgeois said he chose to stop taking the exemption, because “the city needs the money.”  According to state law, residents are supposed to register and vote where they claim homestead exemption.
The city-parish plan of government says Metro Council members must be qualified voters and residents of their district but doesn’t expressly define what constitutes residency.

Several court challenges have arisen over the years in Louisiana raising the issue of whether a particular elected official or candidate resides in the district he or she is running for but these generally have not been successful because state law defining legal residency is so loosely written.  Brandon Abadie, deputy clerk of court in East Baton Rouge Parish, said the office uses the voter registration address of candidates to determine whether they are running in the correct district. He said questions of residency are left to the courts to decide.  Delgado said he would not mount a legal challenge against Bourgeois’s residency.  “But I think the voters in District 12 should know the facts and decide for themselves whether this is acceptable to them.”
Delgado and Bourgeois, both Republicans, are being contested by Democrat Rose Carey in the Nov. 6 primary.  District 12 includes the Kenilworth, Magnolia Woods, Pollard, Southdowns, and Valley Park neighborhoods.

Friday is the deadline to challenge candidacy to get a name removed from the ballot.

Only Two of Eleven Registered Live Oaks Preserved

From:	CPL70600@aol.com
Sent:	Mon 4/11/11 1:08 PM
To:	saveNoak@hotmail.com

This is like an obituary.  How very sad.    This seems to be something that was railroaded through with the City having no intentions of working it out, perhaps with a three lane road.  I shall mark the trees on the Registry with the note "Destroyed by the Government of the City of Baton Rouge".  The LSU Reveille was doing a story on this.  I shall send the reporter your list.  I am very saddened and know how much pain this has caused the people on Staring Lane.

Coleen Perilloux Landry

Ensure Preservation of Last Two Registered Live Oaks on Staring Lane

From: Strhlfrst@aol.com
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:31:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [SaveOurOaks] Tally of Registered Live Oaks Along Staring Lane

You did all you could. It was too late to intervene once the plans were approved and the tree removal began. Unfortunately, this is what the outside world will see of Baton Rouge and its "green" program, but at least it appears that two of the most significant trees will remain. Now you all will need to turn toward monitoring construction impacts to make sure the contractors make no mistakes around those last two trees. Insist upon participation in the contractor orientation process by a certified arborist familiar with large tree conservation, and be sure that his instructions for clear zones, protective fence, etc. are followed.

Councilman Requested to Initiate Reactivation of Tree Commission

From: DGOUX@brgov.com
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:23:16 -0500

Councilman Bourgeois was out of town last week and will be back by tomorrow.  I talked to him by phone and he agrees with your thoughts on the Tree Commission.  He will call you when he returns.  Thank you.

Deanna Goux

Legislative Assistant to Councilman Bourgeois

Phone:  389-4697

Fax:      389-8895

From: REdwards@brgov.com
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:20:16 -0500

I would suggest that you ask your Councilmember to reactivate the Commission by requiring a study or report on the Commission to the full Council.  That would place the item on the agenda for public hearing and debate.

Ronnie Edwards

Baton Rouge Metro Councilwoman
District 5
P. O. Box 1471
Baton Rouge, LA  70821
3525 Riley Street
Baton Rouge, LA  70805
225.389.4831
225.389.5171
redwards@brgov.com

---

Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 10:41 PM
To: Ronnie Edwards (District 5)

It is unclear to me how I might work to have the Tree Commission reestablished.  It was set up under city ordinance, and no action has been taken by the city to dismember it.  Legally, I am unsure where this puts us.  Any suggestions?

Advocate Article 3/28/11

http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/Oaks-lost-in-road-widening.html?showAll=y&c=y

Tally of Registered Live Oaks Along Staring Lane

As of 4/10/11, only two of the 11 registered live oaks along Staring Lane are to be saved.  Road construction on lower half of Staring Lane is set to begin in August 2011, if funds continue to support.

Untouched, marked 'to save':

 

5249 MARC OAK  364 Staring Lane  27.01 

5253 PRIDE OF STARING  402 Staring Lane  14.02 

Cropped, ready for removal:

6169 STARING HOPE 467 Staring Lane  12.01  [one branch remains]

6183 ROBIN OAK 321 Staring Lane   09.06

6184 LAUREL OAK 321 Staring Lane  11.09

5786 CLARE  649 Staring Lane  11.03 

5787 ORIE  649 Staring Lane  11.00 

5788 OLIVE  649 Staring Lane  9.06 

5789 PHOENIX  560 Staring Lane  11.02    [half of crown remains]

5790 THOR  560 Staring Lane  9.00 

5440 TREY  572 Staring Lane  10.05 

 

STATUS 4/10/11: Registered Live Oak "STARING HOPE" (Girth 12.01 ft) at 467 Staring Lane

 

"STARING HOPE" is on left.  One branch left uncropped... 

Former View, 3/17/11 ("STARING HOPE" on left):

STATUS 4/10/11: Registered Live Oaks "ROBIN OAK" (Girth 9.06 ft) and "LAUREL OAK" (Girth 11.09 ft) at 321 Staring Lane

Former View, 3/17/11:

Per CSRS, Issuance of US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Permits = All Environmental Impacts Addressed

Still no answer from US Army Corps of Engineers...

Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:56 PM
To: 'Edwin.A.Lyon@usace.army.mil'
Cc: 'metrocouncil@brgov.com'; 'hq-publicaffairs@usace.army.mil'; 'John.E.Singley@USACE.ARMY.MIL'
Subject: Environmental Impact: Green Light Project to Widen Staring Lane

Does the US Army Corps of Engineers agree that issuance of wetland permits for this project represents USACOE approval that all environmental impacts have been satisfactorily addressed?

From: John Snow [mailto:jsnow@consultssa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 5:18 PMSubject: RE: Green Light Project to Widen Staring Lane (Chandler to Highland Rd Stretch)

Please see below for responses to your questions/comments.

·      Project Environmental Document only discusses area immediately around Bayou Duplantier, this is not the only area of impact.  Your estimates for environmental mitigation ($ 240,000) are too low.

The entire project limits, Highland Road to Perkins Road, were investigated for wetlands, UST’s, petroleum products and other hazardous chemicals, cultural resources, cemeteries and other requirements of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment standard practice.  All required wetland permits from the USACOE [US Army Corps of Engineers] have been acquired and remain active for this project.  Issuance of said permits reflects the USACOE concurrence of the impacts by this project.  The environmental budget presented in the project’s Concept Report was an estimate of project costs associated with detailed wetland and Phase I ESA studies of the final project limits, permits applications, permit maintenance, and other associated costs.

You Can't Fight City Hall

Within 24 hours after the filming of this WBRZ news segment, the majority of the remaining live oaks along Staring Lane (excluding the four registered live oaks labelled by S.Shurtz/DPW as 'to be saved') were cropped, ready for removal. 

Staring Lane Tree Fight 10pm
http://www.wbrz.com/videoplayer/?video_id=6552

Past Challenge to EBR Parish Tree Commission

From "Business Report", 9/16/2003:

Baton Rouge's new commercial landscape ordinance is causing a riff between the city-parish and a handful of builders and developers who say Baton Rouge can't afford to be so green.Though the ordinance, an update of the 1994 original, was three years and several public meetings in the making, critics argue the Metro Council's July approval was a rush to judgment because it didn't consider the views of those impacted by the changes.Part of the Unified Development Code, the revised landscape ordinance, after a 90-day delay, is scheduled to take effect Nov. 11.


Carolyn Torrance of Salco Construction says the city-parish Landscape and Tree Commission, the group that wrote the new rules, kept commercial builders out of the process to squelch dissenting viewpoints. The development community, she contends, didn't learn of the regulations until June, when the Planning Commission gave the ordinance its blessing. Moreover, Torrance and others worry the additional landscaping requirements will dramatically increase the cost of construction, impact the size of buildings and stifle industrial development in older sections of the parish.'When I read the ordinance I see cost, cost, cost,' said Torrance. 'The city is spending everyone else's money very easily.'


Commission members counter that the complaints are much ado about nothing. They say there's nothing onerous about the ordinance and that the public is demanding a greener Baton Rouge.'The changes we've made are baby steps,' said commission member Dennis 'Buck' Abbey, a landscape architect and associate professor at LSU. 'They've made it sound like the world is falling apart.'The new ordinance not only requires more landscaping on commercial and industrial projects but also calls for larger trees and additional green space buffer zones. Supporters of the ordinance contend better landscaped developments, both residential and commercial, aren't just important for environmental and aesthetic reasons but also aid the city's quest to attract companies with higher paying, white collar jobs.'The cities of the future aren't going to look like Airline Highway, they'll look like Highland Road,' said Abbey. 'Visit any thriving city and that's what you'll see.'While East Baton Rouge Parish is relatively green, with 45 percent of the parish covered by tree canopy, experts point out that the percentage has dropped 11 percent from a decade ago.  https://www.businessreport.com/news/2003/sep/16/the-cost-of-green/


Note: Subsequently, downtown Baton Rouge did put in place a "tree ordinance"....
Ordinance 14363 (Adopted by MetroCouncil on 3/19/2008), Section X, "Streetscape Planting":
http://www.downtownbatonrouge.org/downloads/pdf/AEordinance.pdf

Ordinance-Driven EBR Parish Tree Commission Has Been Inactive for Two Years

Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:31 PM
To: 'council-dist12@brgov.com'
Subject: EBR Parish Tree Commission is Inactive

Spoke by phone yesterday with S.Shurtz / DPW arborist.  The EBR Tree Commission, created by ordinance in 1991, has been “inactive for several years now”.  By design, it has basically no authority, serves only as an advocacy organization.  S.Shurtz mentioned the commission members largely all quit in protest a few years ago.  He indicated the commission may no longer be needed because we have an active independent advocacy group, Baton Rouge Green.  I disagree. We need an advocacy group not associated with special interests, with members serving for specified terms.

I spoke with two former commission members.  Both expressed frustrations with their former roles.  They mentioned a litany of problems: difficult to get all commission members to attend meetings, difficult to gain the ear of the Mayor, Mayor would not appoint commission member vacancies, MetroCouncilmen not receptive to commission recommendations, difficulty in putting proper city ordinances in place, no MetroCouncil support. 

Do you support the existence of an EBR Tree Commission?  If this group was put in place via city-parish ordinance, how can it remain in an inactive state for years…especially during implementation of the Mayor’s Green Light Projects?

Green Light Project Spokesman States Noise Study for Staring Lane Widening Not Warranted

From: John Snow [mailto:jsnow@consultssa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 5:18 PM
Cc: Brad Ponder (Ponder@csrsonline.com)
Subject: RE: Green Light Project to Widen Staring Lane (Chandler to Highland Rd Stretch)

Please see below for responses to your questions/comments.

·    Is there room for discussion on the scope of this project?  

No, the current scope and design of the project will remain as-is throughout the construction period.  The design of this project was previously finalized after having been through several design iterations in response to public concerns while continuing to meet the specified design criteria.

·    Can the mile above Highland remain as-is?  It is design complete, but construction only 4% complete.

No – as determined through the design phase, improving only intersections and limited stretches of this corridor does meet the future traffic demands of the corridor.  The contractor is now under contract with the City-Parish for construction of all plan and specification requirements for the entire corridor, from Highland Road to Perkins Road.  The City-Parish intends to continue with construction of the project as stipulated in the contract.

·    Project Environmental Document only discusses area immediately around Bayou Duplantier, this is not the only area of impact.  Your estimates for environmental mitigation ($ 240,000) are too low.

The entire project limits, Highland Road to Perkins Road, were investigated for wetlands, UST’s, petroleum products and other hazardous chemicals, cultural resources, cemeteries and other requirements of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment standard practice.  All required wetland permits from the USACOE have been acquired and remain active for this project.  Issuance of said permits reflects the USACOE concurrence of the impacts by this project.  The environmental budget presented in the project’s Concept Report was an estimate of project costs associated with detailed wetland and Phase I ESA studies of the final project limits, permits applications, permit maintenance, and other associated costs.

·     Your project indicates "noise study may be needed".  It is needed as impact is already being felt by the neighborhoods.

The comment “noise study may be needed” was provided as part of the initial concept study.  These concept studies were meant to provide wide-angle views of all Green Light projects in order to more accurately define project scope and budgets.  After this step, the City-Parish hired design engineers for all of the Green Light projects through a professional engineer selection process.  It was during this phase of the design where additional studies were determined to be warranted or not warranted.  Based on the scope of the proposed Staring Lane project, a noise study was not warranted.

Thanks,

John

 

From: Ponder, Brad [mailto:Ponder@csrsonline.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:55 PM
Cc: Songy, Michael; John Snow
Subject: FW: URGENT GLP Website Inquiry

We have been instructed by the Mayor’s Office and DPW Director to have all public and news media comments and questions go to Mr. John Snow, spokesman for the Green Light Plan.  It is felt this will provide the public and news media with consistent and timely communication regarding all projects in the Green Light Plan.

John Snow can be contacted at jsnow@consultssa.com.

Thank you.

Brad Ponder, P.E.

GLP Program Manager

CSRS, Inc.

6767 Perkins Road, Suite 200

Baton Rouge, La 70808

(225) 769-0546 – Office

(225) 603-9647 – Mobile

Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 1:41 PM
To: John Snow
Cc: Ponder@csrsonline.com; jalvarez@brgov.com; wessman@csrsonline.com; rallen@theadvocate.com
Subject: Green Light Project to Widen Staring Lane (Chandler to Highland Rd Stretch)

Can you field these remaining unanswered questions/comments:

·      Is there room for discussion on the scope of this project?

·      Can the mile above Highland remain as-is?  It is design complete, but construction only 4% complete.

·      Project Environmental Document only discusses area immediately around Bayou Duplantier, this is not the only area of impact.  Your estimates for environmental mitigation ($ 240,000) are too low.

·      Your project indicates "noise study may be needed".  It is needed as impact is already being felt by the neighborhoods.

Complaint Submitted to Entergy Regarding Damage Caused by Tree Trimming Crews Along Staring Lane

Describe:		Tree Trimming Crews Responsible for Unnecessary Tree Damage Along Staring Lane Chris Holeman, CSRS Project Manager for the Green Light Staring Lane widening, mentioned the all tree cropping to date has being performed by Entergy tree trimming crews, with a view to location of the power lines. In short, several registered live oaks have been irreparably damaged by these tree trimming crews. For example, Registered Live Oak #5790 at 560 Staring Lane, which was cited on 3/24/11 by DPW as "pruned but may survive". As a former Entergy employee (for almost 10 years), this is truly disheartening to me.
If you have a complaint, do you have a proposed solution?:		Entergy should offer to replace the damaged trees (replant with ones of comparable size, after the widening effort) and offer to build protective fences, to prevent damage by upcoming construction crews, for those registered live oaks deemed saveable. Registered Live Oak #6169 at 467 Staring Lane Registered Live Oak #5790 at 560 Staring Lane Registered Live Oak #5249 at 364 Staring Lane

Entergy Tree Trimming Crews Responsible for Tree Damage Along Staring Lane

Chris Holeman is the Project Manager for the Staring Lane widening.  He is subcontracted to CSRS Program Management.  The current plans for the widening effort involve both a 30 ft raised median (grass) and curb & gutter, "like Bluebonnet Road".  The widening effort is split into two phases, North of Chandler (completing in August 2011) and South of Chandler (start overlapping completion of other phase).  He mentioned the tree cropping to date is being performed by Entergy tree trimming crews, with a view to location of the power lines;  at present, the construction group tree removals have not begun in the 'South of Chandler' phase.

In short, Registered Live Oak #5790 ("Phoenix") at 560 Staring Lane, which was labelled as "pruned but may survive" in DPW List of 3/24/11, was damaged by Entergy tree trimming crews!

Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:13 AM
To: 'holeman@csrsonline.com'
Cc: 'rallen@theadvocate.com'; 'CPL70600@aol.com'; 'Steve Shurtz'
Subject: Three Special Live Oaks Along Staring Lane in Path of Green Light Project

Thanks for speaking with me today and clarifying design details of the Staring Lane Project (widening from Perkins Rd to Highland Rd)!  Attached is the survey performed by the DPW arborist on 3/24/11, which indicates the status of each of the 11 registered live oaks along this stretch of roadway.  I am especially interested in protecting the following three live oaks (one was cited on the DPW List as ‘will not survive’, but has not as yet been touched).  Addresses and photos are included to help locate them.

Perhaps you can advise me as to plans to protect these three oaks?

Registered Live Oak #6169 "STARING HOPE" (Girth 12.2 ft) at 467 Staring Lane

Approx Project Station  123+00

“Will Not Survive” (but at present untouched)

Registered Live Oak #5790 "PHOENIX" (Girth 11.02 ft) at 560 Staring Lane

Approx Project Station  130+50

“Pruned but may survive” per DPW List of 3/24/11

 

Registered Live Oak #5249  "MARC OAK" (Girth 27.01 ft) at 364 Staring Lane

Approx Project Station 115+50

“Not Scheduled for Removal” per DPW List of 3/24/11

All Roads Lead Back to Green Light Project

From: Ellen Miller [mailto:EMILLER@brgov.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:11 AM
Cc: Troy Bunch; Ryan Holcomb; songy@csrs.com; bponder@csrs.com
Subject: RE: Request Response Regarding Green Light Project to Widen Staring Lane

Mr. Holcomb described the Planning Commission’s role in the Green Light Plan.  Further questions regarding the Green Light Plan should be referred to Mr. Michael Songy or Brad Ponder at CSRS.

From: Ryan Holcomb [mailto:RHOLCOMB@brgov.com]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 4:15 PM
Cc: Troy Bunch; Ellen Miller; songy@csrs.com; bponder@csrs.com
Subject: RE: Request Response Regarding Green Light Project to Widen Staring Lane

The Planning Commission provides land use and transportation input related to the comprehensive plan to help guide future growth and development.  Our office has not been involved in any scoping or design of this specific project.  We refer any detailed questions regarding this Green Light Plan project  to Brad Ponder at bponder@csrsonline.com.

The Green Light Plan
6767 Perkins Road, Suite 200
Baton Rouge, LA 70808
USA
Tel:+ 225-761-3600

                Sincerely,

Ryan L. Holcomb

Planning Project Coordinator

City-Parish Planning Commission

Baton Rouge, LA

(225) 389-3144

Date: March 26, 2011 12:36:36 PM EDT
To: Troy Bunch <TBUNCH@brgov.com>
Subject: Request Response Regarding Green Light Project to Widen Staring Lane

How would you define the role the Planning Commission has had to date in the Green Light Project to widen Staring Lane?  Have they been involved in scoping this project…e.g., determining the 25 ft from road centerline boundaries?

Request for Special Meeting of EBR Parish Tree Commission

Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 11:09 AM
To: 'Athena_9@bellsouth.net'; 'aaincla@aol.com'
Cc: 'rallen@theadvocate.com'
Subject: Proposed Agenda Item for Upcoming EBR Parish Tree Commission Meeting (4/20/11)

Eleven live oaks registered by the Live Oak Society have either been “removed” or are being threatened by the Green Light Project phase to widen Staring Lane.  At the next meeting (4/20/11) of the EBR Parish Tree Commission, can the fate (including protection of those marked for saving) of these live oaks be discussed?  W.Daniel of DPW indicates only four of these (five possibly) will be saved.  I am concerned about protection from road construction activities for those marked to be saved.  I would also like to reconsider those not yet removed or significantly cropped as possible candidates for being saved.

I am also a bit concerned that your next scheduled meeting may be too far in the future to prevent day-to-day damage potential.  Can a special meeting be called in the next week?

           

Mayor Holden's Wife Involved in 2007 Live Oak Dedication

In February 2007, Mayor Holden's wife was involved in live oak dedication in the Garden District.  Also present were the current DPW arborist and two current Tree Commission members. 

Garden District Civic Association

Garden District Board Minutes – Feb. 21, 2007

Suzanne [Schexnayder] reported on the live oak dedication, which will be at 10 a.m., on Feb. 24, 2007. Forty-four households adopted 101 trees. Mrs. Holden, the mayor’s wife, will be present to name a new tree. Coleen Perrileaux Landry, the representative from the Louisiana Live Oak Society, Peggy Davis, from Baton Rouge Green, and Steve Shurtz and Jerry Juneau, both urban foresters with the city will be present.

Lafayette LA Making Enviable Strides in Live Oak Protection

TreesAcadiana to Canvas City Oaks with GPS

On Saturday, February 26 [2011], TreesAcadiana has scheduled a field operation to update the 75-year registry of the Live Oak Society with the added detail of global positioning system (GPS) coordinates and current measurements for those trees currently on the list.  Lafayette is credited with over 250 live oaks over 8 feet in circumference.  TreesAcadiana believes this represents a small percentage of the qualifying live oaks in Lafayette.

The Society’s registrar, Coleen Landry of New Orleans, affirms that having the GPS coordinates for the trees would be a very helpful addition of information to affirm and locate existing trees.  Participants are encouraged to bring tape measures, writing instruments, GPS devises, and clip boards if they have these readily available.  Other cities in Lafayette Parish are encouraged to do the same.  The Live Oak Society was initiated in Lafayette by the first president of UL-Lafayette in 1934.  According to TreesAcadiana Chairperson Sarah Schoefler, “Lafayette has many live oaks and it only stands to reason that the City should have one of the highest counts on the registry.”  She adds, “We hope to make that happen.”

The public is invited to join TreesAcadiana’s general meeting to take place at Pack & Paddle, 601 East Pinhook in Lafayette, on March 22 where Steve A. Shurtz, Urban Forestry and Landscape Manager for the East Baton Rouge City-Parish Department of Public Works, will address the group as keynote speaker with his focus on Louisiana’s heritage live oaks.  Steve has twice served as president of the Society of Municipal Arborists (SMA), is a past president of the Louisiana Chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA), was recently elected to the Board of Trustees of the ASLA, and is currently President of the Louisiana Urban Forestry Council. He recently completed his second term as a member of the National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council (NUCFAC), an advisory group to the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture.

http://treesacadiana.org/articles/treesacadiana-to-canvas-city-oaks-with-gps/